Download a recent issue

This bimonthly publication focuses on current and past political events and trends, and offers a unique look at what those things mean for the future. Contact us for subscription information.

"If you read just three people analyzing American politics today, do yourself a favor and make certain that Rhodes Cook is one of them. Rhodes is one of the three wisest Americans now analyzing this country's politics. As somebody who writes on politics, I want my reader to have one of two reactions: 1) Gee, I never knew that or 2) Gee, I never thought of it that way! Every time I read Rhodes Cook I have both reactions--with some envy--Gee, I never knew that and Gee, I never thought of it that way." 

~ Mark Shields, Analyst on PBS's NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, panelist on "Inside Washington," Syndicated Columnist, Creators Syndicate.

« Joe Lieberman: A 'Sore Winner"? | Main | The Power of Words »
Friday
Dec112009

Some Primary Thoughts

The Massachusetts Senate primary Dec. 8 did not anoint a new senator to succeed the late Edward M. Kennedy (and his temporary replacement, Paul Kirk). But there was nothing in the results that would point to anything but a Democratic special election victory Jan. 19.

Turnout for the Democratic primary in this heavily Democratic state was more than four times as large as for its Republican counterpart. And while pundits tended to dismiss the Democratic turnout as tepid, it was really not bad at all when compared to recent Senate nominating races in Massachusetts and even high-profile presidential primaries.

To be sure, the roughly 665,000 voters who cast ballots in Tuesday’s Democratic Senate primary represented barely half the number who voted in Massachusetts early last year in the extraordinary contest between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. But turnout for the Democratic Senate primary was higher than the party’s two other presidential primaries this decade, including that in 2004 when Massachusetts’ own John Kerry was on the ballot.

The Democrat who won the Senate nomination this week, state Attorney General Martha Coakley, showed strong vote-getting appeal across the state. In a four-way race, she took nearly half the vote, and outside runner-up Michael Capuano’s Boston-area congressional district, she swept all but a handful of cities and towns.

Coakley carried cities such as Springfield and Worcester, old industrial centers such as Fall River and Lowell, suburbs such as Brookline and Newton, academic towns such as Northampton (Smith College) and Williamstown (Williams College), plus the gay-friendly community of Provincetown on the tip of Cape Cod.  

Her Republican opponent next month, state Sen. Scott Brown, was also a big winner on the GOP side. But in a state that has not elected a Republican senator since 1972, the most realistic goal for Brown would be just to run close to Coakley in next month’s special election. That by itself would be a considerable feat, since over the last 37 years only GOP Gov. William Weld in 1996 has come within 10 percentage points of the Democratic Senate victor. 

To read more stories on the Senate primary in Massachusetts visit www.boston.com.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

thanks very good article
oyun indir

January 3, 2010 | Unregistered Commenteroyun indir

Excellent post Mr. Rhodes... Very informative!

__
ParaSlim

January 3, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAcai Optimum

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>