Download a recent issue

This bimonthly publication focuses on current and past political events and trends, and offers a unique look at what those things mean for the future. Contact us for subscription information.

"If you read just three people analyzing American politics today, do yourself a favor and make certain that Rhodes Cook is one of them. Rhodes is one of the three wisest Americans now analyzing this country's politics. As somebody who writes on politics, I want my reader to have one of two reactions: 1) Gee, I never knew that or 2) Gee, I never thought of it that way! Every time I read Rhodes Cook I have both reactions--with some envy--Gee, I never knew that and Gee, I never thought of it that way." 

~ Mark Shields, Analyst on PBS's NewsHour with Jim Lehrer, panelist on "Inside Washington," Syndicated Columnist, Creators Syndicate.

« First, Do No Harm | Main | If Obama Thought His First Year was Difficult... »
Wednesday
13Jan2010

Time for the Democrats to Worry?

Depending on which poll one tends to favor, the Democratic senatorial nominee in Massachusetts is either way ahead of or narrowly behind her Republican rival with the special election to fill Ted Kennedy’s seat just one week off.

According to a Boston Globe poll taken early this month, state Attorney General Martha Coakley leads GOP state Sen. Scott Brown among likely voters by 50% to 35%, with 5% of respondents for Joe Kennedy, who bills himself as “The Tea Party Candidate.” (The latter is no relation to the similarly named member of the Kennedy clan). Other recent surveys have shown a more competitive race, from a Coakley lead in the high single digits to one showing Brown up by 1 point.

One thing is certain: a Coakley loss would be a disaster for the Democrats nationally. They are already reeling from decisive gubernatorial losses in Virginia and New Jersey and a recent rush of congressional and gubernatorial retirements. A loss in the bluest of blue states - for Kennedy’s seat no less - might throw the party into a deep funk that they may not be able to escape in 2010.

At first glance, the terrain appears tailor made for a Democratic victory in the Jan. 19 special election. Democrats have held both Senate seats in Massachusetts since the late 1970s, all 10 House seats since the mid-1990s, and Barack Obama carried the Bay State in the 2008 presidential election by the landslide margin of 26 percentage points.

But that is just part of the picture. Massachusetts has a large blue-collar population vulnerable to the current economic downturn, a strong Roman Catholic presence that can push debate in a socially conservative direction, and a huge mass of independent voters that has helped elect Republican governors on a regular basis over the last two decades.

In this environment, a Democratic loss next Tuesday would be explainable. But given the state’s liberal reputation, it would still be a very bitter pill for the party to swallow. And it would immediately raise the question: If the Democrats can’t win in Massachusetts, where can they?

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>